(no subject)
Jun. 14th, 2004 01:33 amoh, another thought...
seymour=gilgamesh of ffx (like gilgamesh in ff5)
why?
1) he keeps coming back (although at least seymour doesn't run away)
2) he's not the main bad guy, but just a front for him
3) you can't fight the real bad guy until you finally get rid of him, and even then, it can take a while, depending
4) wimpy weapons. Seymour uses a friggin' wand (that's what it's called, ne? because it's the same as yuna's and that's what hers are:P) and gilgamesh tried that 'excalipur' crap
5) I say so.
seymour=gilgamesh of ffx (like gilgamesh in ff5)
why?
1) he keeps coming back (although at least seymour doesn't run away)
2) he's not the main bad guy, but just a front for him
3) you can't fight the real bad guy until you finally get rid of him, and even then, it can take a while, depending
4) wimpy weapons. Seymour uses a friggin' wand (that's what it's called, ne? because it's the same as yuna's and that's what hers are:P) and gilgamesh tried that 'excalipur' crap
5) I say so.